United States v. Gibson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*277Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Judge:
We granted the accused’s petition for review because it presented an issue within the compass of a question certified for review in United States v Johnson, 21 USCMA 270, 45 CMR 44, decided this date. A comparison of the operative facts in both cases reveals a substantial difference.
In Johnson, the trial judge considered the evidence of mitigation in the record and made a specific recommendation to the convening authority for suspension of parts of the sentence he had adjudged. Without mention of any matter pertinent to the issue, the convening authority…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SikorskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. HommelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. SteffeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973