Kingsport Horizontal Property Regime v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Introduction
This case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment as to the government’s liability, under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, for the alleged taking of plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs, nine land owners of individual properties located on the Atlantic Intraeoastal Waterway in Horry County, South Carolina, seek just compensation for land lost as a result of erosion on the government-constructed waterway. Defendant defends on the ground that wave-wash generated by private boat traffic, and not the government’s construction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Mildenberger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003