Legal Opinion

Padel v. Narits

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for defendant based on a jury verdict in a personal injury action growing out of a collision between automobiles in a street intersection in Portland.

The accident occurred in the intersection of East Burnside Street (hereinafter Burnside) and Southeast 32d Avenue (hereinafter 32d) in the City of Portland. Burnside at the time of the accident was a four-lane highway west of 32d. To the east of 32d it had but two lanes. Traffic at the intersection was controlled by a traffic light. Plaintiff was riding in a car driven by her friend John Konies east on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galer v. WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State of Oregon v. KaderOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hamilton v. UNION OIL COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wilson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lane v. HatfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Harkins v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Clubb v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fickert v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API