Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. UNION OIL COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1959PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment in this action to recover damages for personal injuries based on negligence.

The action grows out of a fall sustained by the plaintiff in a gasoline service station in Lowell, Oregon, which was operated by the defendant, Milo Dixon, under a sub-lease from the defendant, Union Oil Company, a corporation, hereinafter called Union. Generally, the plaintiff charged that her fall was caused by defective premises and negligence in maintaining them. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the court allowed a motion for involuntary non-suit in favor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Whalen v. ShivekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. McHenry v. HOWELLS ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Staples v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Briggs v. John Yeon Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schlender v. Andy Jansen CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Glorioso v. NessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Ault v. Del Var Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API