Peterson v. Peterson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Howard Peterson appeals from the trial court’s divorce judgment, arguing the court’s valuation of assets and distribution of property are clearly erroneous. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] After twenty-eight years of marriage, Mildred Peterson and Howard Peterson divorced on October 5, 1998. Howard Peterson had owned 1,907 acres of South Dakota and Minnesota farmland before his marriage with Mildred Peterson. During their marriage, Howard Peterson’s occupation was real estate investment and management.
[¶ 3] A trial was held after which the trial 'court issued findings of fact,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Freed v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Heggen v. HeggenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Riehl v. RiehlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Reiser v. ReiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Heinz v. HeinzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Horner v. HornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.