Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1999No. 980352PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Howard Peterson appeals from the trial court’s divorce judgment, arguing the court’s valuation of assets and distribution of property are clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] After twenty-eight years of marriage, Mildred Peterson and Howard Peterson divorced on October 5, 1998. Howard Peterson had owned 1,907 acres of South Dakota and Minnesota farmland before his marriage with Mildred Peterson. During their marriage, Howard Peterson’s occupation was real estate investment and management.

[¶ 3] A trial was held after which the trial 'court issued findings of fact,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Freed v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Heggen v. HeggenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Riehl v. RiehlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Reiser v. ReiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Heinz v. HeinzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Horner v. HornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API