Legal Opinion

Bank of E. Conemaugh v. Davies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1934No. Appeal, 227PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This is a suit for the balance claimed on a written agreement, dated July 6, 1922, whereby the defendants, who are all but two of the directors of the Navy Smokeless Coal Company, a corporation, became sureties * for the payment of obligations issued or assumed by tbe corporation and at that time held by tbe plaintiff bank. In tbe agreement, tbe subscribing directors, defendants, “jointly and severally agree that they, tbe parties of tbe first part, and each and every of them will, when and as requested so to do, make payment of and discharge and satisfy tbe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillin v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. DashiellSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Hild v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. J.F. Walker Co. v. Excalibur Oil Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Neal D. Ivey Co. v. Franklin Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Minnotte AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Oliver v. Autographic Register Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  5. Reading Tube Corp. v. Steel Workers Federation & Reading Tube LocalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API