Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1910No. Appeal, No. 251PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 3,943, on verdict for defendants in case of Knickerbocker Trust Company and William B. Randall, Trustees, v. James J. Ryan and John A. Kelley, Copartners, trading as Ryan and Kelley. Assumpsit for rental of cars. Before Carr, J. Errors, assigned among others were (1) admission of check as abové; (7, 8, 9, 12, 13) above instructions, quoting them.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

February 21, 1910:

We are not convinced that there is any reversible error in this record. The statement avers that by the contract the lessees agreed “to pay to the lessors the rental of $5.00 per car for each and every day after the said date of July 9,1905, until said twenty-four cars were returned to the lessors,” and that the totalj number of days fot which the twenty-four cars were held after July 9, the expiration of the term, “was equivalent to the detaining of one car for 1,095 days, for each and every of which days the rental of $5.00 was due from the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. MOWRY v. McWherterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Robinson v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Orth & Bro. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API