Legal Opinion

Reading Tube Corp. v. Steel Workers Federation & Reading Tube Local

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, No. 107PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright., J.,

This is an arbitration case. On December 21, 1950, the Reading Tube Corporation (hereinafter called the Company) posted a notice requiring all employes in *276the casting shop to wear safety shoes after February 1, 1951. There was some opposition among the employes and, after negotiations, the effective date was postponed to March 1, 1951. On March 5, 1951, the Company posted a notice that, effective March 7, 1951, all casting shop employes who were not using safety shoes or who did not have them on order would be violating Company rules. A number of employes failed to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. McCrackenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. A. J. Curtis and Company v. D. W. Falls, Inc., and Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. Povey v. the Midvale Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Smith v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Derry Township Municipal Authority v. Solomon & Davis, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API