Legal Opinion

Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. CA 13331, SC 27330Published

1Opinion of the Court

630 P.2d 827 (1981)

291 Or. 293

Dale Thomas BLAIR, Respondent,

v.

MT. HOOD MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner.

No. CA 13331; SC 27330.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted March 2, 1981.

Decided June 30, 1981.

Darrel L. Johnson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were I. Franklin Hunsaker, III, and Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Leslie M. Roberts, of Kell, Alterman & Runstein, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for respondent.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and TONGUE, LINDE, PETERSON, TANZER and CAMPBELL, JJ.

CAMPBELL,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Baccelleri v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McHenry v. HOWELLS ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API