Legal Opinion

Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Development Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. CA 13331, SC 27330PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*295CAMPBELL, J.

This is an action in negligence brought by plaintiff as a result of an injury he sustained while skiing at defendant’s ski facility at Mt. Hood.

Plaintiff, a 28-year-old experienced skier, and a companion had spent a morning skiing on runs prepared by defendant at its facility. The weather on the day of the accident was overcast with mist, causing poor visibility and creating a “flat light” effect, limiting a person’s ability to perceive variations in the depth and other contrasts or contours in the snow. Plaintiff was injured when he chose to return to the lodge by way of a run…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Baccelleri v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Vendrell v. Sch. Dist. 26C, Malheur Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Woolston v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gauvin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Christensen v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API