Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of El Dorado

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1928No. 28,091PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant city, commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while engaged in cutting branches off treés in a park owned by the city. Judgment was rendered in favor of the *154defendant on its demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. The plaintiff appeals.

The petition, without its exhibits, is set out in eleven printed pages of the abstract. The defendant in its brief fairly sets out the facts alleged in the petition as follows:

“Plaintiff went to work for defendant on March 12,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dechant ex rel. Dechant v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Gillaspie v. United Iron-works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kleppe v. PrawlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Franks v. KohlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Hibbs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Parker v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Williams v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API