Legal Opinion

State v. Trax

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2002No. 97CR2980FA, 97CR2980FB A105215 (Control), A105216 (Cases Consolidated)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*195HASELTON, J.

In these consolidated criminal cases, defendants appeal their convictions for manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, ORS 475.999. Defendants assert that the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence gained during a search of their apartment located within a house at 111 Cary Street in Winston, Oregon. The search was carried out pursuant to a search warrant. Defendants argue that the warrant was constitutionally defective because it failed to identify…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. United States v. InnelliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. State v. DevineOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Myer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TraxOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MituniewiczCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. TraxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. TraxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API