Legal Opinion

United States v. Innelli

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1923No. Nos. 167, 168PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

This motion concerns the law of arrests, searches, and seizures. They have been made time out of mind. The power to make them is an absolutely necessary power. Experience, however, has taught us that the power is one open to abuse. The most notable historical instance of it is that of lettres de cachet. Our Constitution was framed during the seethings of' the French Revolution. The thought was to make lettres de cachet impossible with us. Protective guards have in consequence been thrown around us, to lessen the harassments and violations of individual rights to which we might otherwise be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States ex rel. Soeder v. CrossenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Savannah Hinton, United States of America v. Susie Powers, Alias Susie PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. GorgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. State ex rel. King v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API