Legal Opinion

In Re Southern Peru Copper Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 14, 2011No. C.A. 961-CSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Chancellor:

I. Introduction

This is the post-trial decision in an entire fairness case. The controlling stockholder of an NYSE-listed mining company came to the corporation’s independent directors with a proposition. How about you buy my non-publicly traded Mexican mining company for approximately $8.1 billion of your NYSE-listed stock? A special committee was set up to “evaluate” this proposal and it retained well-respected legal and financial advisors.

The financial advisor did a great deal of preliminary due diligence, and generated valuations showing that the Mexican mining…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starr International Co. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Com v. Williams, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. WEIMER v. CAPOZZADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API