Legal Opinion
State v. Furrow
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 7, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Defendant Lawrence J. Furrow appeals from his Superior Court (Cumberland County) convictions, entered after trial by jury, for burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (Supp. 1980), gross sexual misconduct, id. § 253(1)(A), and criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon, id. §§ 209, 1252(4). We find no reversible error in the trial leading to defendant’s convictions, and we accordingly deny his appeal.
At his trial, Furrow insisted on representing himself. Before the Law Court an attorney appears for him and asserts four separate grounds for appeal. However, none of those…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CefaloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. KnightsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. BahreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. GaudetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.