Legal Opinion

People v. Pierrie

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2001No. 99CA2414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

Defendant, Michael Paul Pierric, appeals the sentence entered upon his plea of guilty to the offense of possessing a schedule II controlled substance with intent to distribute. We affirm.

The plea agreement provided that the offense is a class three felony. However, at the sentencing hearing, defendant argued that, pursuant to § 18-18-405(2)(a)(I), C.R.S. 2000, the offense is a class four felony, not a class three felony. Defendant thus argued that he should be required to serve only a three-year mandatory parole period after completing his prison sentence, rather than…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. CagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Boulder County Bd. of Com'rs v. HealthsouthSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. People v. GilmoreColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. PerryColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. FrazierColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API