Legal Opinion

Patton v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 13, 2001No. 00SC82PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

Petitioner Brand Patton pleaded guilty to one count of manufacturing and one count of possessing methamphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance, both counts in violation of section 18-18-405(1)(a), 6 C.R.S. (2000). We granted certiorari in People v. Patton, 7 P.3d 1057 (Colo.App.1999), to determine whether Patton could lawfully be convicted and punished on both counts pursuant to his guilty plea in light of the double jeopardy provisions of the Colorado and United States Constitutions.1 The court of appeals held that Patton was not entitled to dismissal of either conviction. We disagree.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Woellhaf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Beaty v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. AbiodunSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. People v. SimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. BorghesiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API