Legal Opinion
S-O-G- & F-D-B
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3937PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 462
(A.G. 2018) Interim Decision #3937 Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, Respondents Decided by Attorney General September 18, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) Consistent with Matter of Castro-Tum,
27 I&N Dec. 271
(A.G. 2018), immigration judges have no inherent authority to terminate or dismiss removal proceedings. (2) Immigration judges may dismiss or terminate removal proceedings only under the circumstances expressly identified in the regulations, see
8 C.F.R. § 1239.2(c), (f), or where the Department of Homeland Security fails to sustain the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- W-Y-UBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- SANCHEZ-HERBERTBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- ROUSSISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- ROSALES VARGAS and ROSALES ROSALESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
- Mirna Villegas Rendon v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Javier Chavez Gonzalez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- J.J. RODRIGUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.