Legal Opinion
Richard James Barnard v. Gary L. Henman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 10, 1996No. 95-3287PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Richard James Barnard filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming that the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) failed to hold a timely parole revocation hearing and failed to properly credit his prior custody. The district court denied the petition. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 6, 1986, Barnard pled guilty to a narcotics offense in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, and was sentenced to a seven-year term of imprisonment, a three-year special parole term, and ordered to pay a $50 special…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kent Evans v. United States Parole Commission, Jay Van Russell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Terry Galowski v. Gerald A. BergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Nelson Sinclair v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, Leavenworth Federal Prison, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Elias Castillo Tijerina v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Gordon W. Franklin v. Fenton, Warden C.E., Lewisburg PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michael Hill v. Robert WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Curtis v. USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Walton v. U.S. Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Frank Sacco v. William HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Michael A. Pearson v. David W. HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.