Legal Opinion
Curtis v. USA
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2005No. 03-6411UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARGUS, District Judge.
Ronnie Lee Curtis appeals the decision of the district court which found that the United States Parole Commission has lodged a valid detainer against him. He also appeals the decision of the district court finding the United States Parole Commission did not violate the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. We affirm.
I
Curtis is a many-times over convicted felon who contends that he is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Parole Commission. Curtis’s federal convictions occurred prior to the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3551, et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nelson Sinclair v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, Leavenworth Federal Prison, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Joseph Herbert Mars v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Elias Castillo Tijerina v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Farid Masud Asad v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner Lynn Underdown Leslie Klinefelter Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pate v. USADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Reid v. Suffolk County Probation Department, MADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- State v. DickersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Tate v. USADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- White v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.