Legal Opinion
Gordon W. Franklin v. Fenton, Warden C.E., Lewisburg Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1980No. 79-2652PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
After being apprehended on a violator’s warrant, petitioner was returned to federal parole supervision within two weeks. Upon release, a new warrant was issued but not executed until after petitioner had pleaded guilty to state criminal charges. The district court found the procedures followed by the Parole Commission permissible but granted petitioner credit for time spent in custody pursuant to the warrants. We affirm.
The matter came to the courts when petitioner, an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, asked the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ernest James Cox and Ella Doris RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Paul E. Maslauskas, in No. 79-1845 v. U. S. Board of Parole, Paul E. Maslauskas, in No. 79-2139 v. Charles E. Fenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States Ex Rel. LiPuma v. GenglerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Paul G. SczubelekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BazzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Cronn v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Minor Michael Still v. United States Marshal, United States Parole Commission and Denver Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Michael Thigpen v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.