Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Builders' Mutual Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 1875PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Contract upon a policy of insurance against fire, issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Brigham, C. J., the defendant declined to argue the case to the jury under the instruction of the presiding judge, submitted to a verdict for the plaintiffs, and alleged exceptions to the rulings of the judge and to his refusal to rule as requested, the substance of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

Many questions which were discussed at the trial and also at the hearing at bar, need not be considered, as there is one ground which we deem to be conclusive against the defence here sought to be established.

The policy of insurance, issued by the defendant upon December 13,1872, and taking effect on that day, was for the term of three years, and contained' the express condition “ that if the assured shall have made or shall hereafter make any other insurance upon said property without the knowledge or consent of *122this company in writing, then in such case this policy shall be void.”

On…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bardwell v. Conway Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Parkway, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. American Insurance v. ReplogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Gurnett v. Atlas Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Hayes v. Milford Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API