Alleyne v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant shipowner to transfer this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) (1962) from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the District Court for the Panama Canal Zone. This motion is denied.
The plaintiff, a seaman, brought suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 (1958), in this district for personal injuries allegedly resulting from a fall while boarding the M/V ASO MARU which ship is owned by the defendant.
The following are pertinent facts on the question of the most convenient jurisdiction for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clendenin v. United Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Fitzgerald v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Biedrzycki v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- De Moraes v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minnis v. PeeblesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Clay v. Overseas Carriers Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Harris v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Thomas v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kellum v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.