Legal Opinion

Alleyne v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-3347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant shipowner to transfer this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) (1962) from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the District Court for the Panama Canal Zone. This motion is denied.

The plaintiff, a seaman, brought suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 (1958), in this district for personal injuries allegedly resulting from a fall while boarding the M/V ASO MARU which ship is owned by the defendant.

The following are pertinent facts on the question of the most convenient jurisdiction for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clendenin v. United Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Fitzgerald v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Biedrzycki v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. De Moraes v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Minnis v. PeeblesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Clay v. Overseas Carriers Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Harris v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Thomas v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Kellum v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API