Legal Opinion
Craig v. Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 15, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2011-1200PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Joanne Craig brought an employment discrimination action against De fendant the District of Columbia under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VIP), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C. Code § 2-1401.01 et seq. (“DCHRA”). Following a trial, the jury-returned a verdict in favor of Ms. Craig, awarding her…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Tridico v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Radtke v. CaschettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.