Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cone v. Garner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

The appellee filed in the Pulaski Circuit Court the following petition for a writ of mandamus :

“Plaintiff is the duly elected, qualified, commissioned and acting tax assessor of Pulaski County, Arkansas, and the defendant is the duly elected, qualified, commissioned and acting Auditor of State for the State of Arkansas.
“Under the provisions of act 51 of the Acts of the General Assembly for the year 1925, fixing the compensation to be paid assessors in counties having a population in excess of 75,000 persons as shown by the last Federal census, plaintiff and his assistants are entitled to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Ark-Ash Lumber Co. v. Pride & FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Hickey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. KaiserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Huff v. UdeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Stanley v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Julie A. Bellamy v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cash v. Sonken-Calamba Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Matthews v. ByrdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API