Reach & Associates, P.C. v. Dencer
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (D.I. 21). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiffs bring contract and tort claims against the Defendants. These claims stem from a dispute over legal services provided by Plaintiffs to Defendant Imperial Rubber Industries, Inc. (“IRI”). Specifically, Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint against Defendants on August 25, 2002, alleging: 1) breach of contract; 2) promissory estoppel; 3) action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears PlcDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Joint Stock Society "Trade House of Descendants of Peter Smirnoff, Official Purveyor to the Imperial Court" v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Shoemaker v. McConnellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Traynor v. LiuDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- L'Athene, Inc. v. EARTHSPRING LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Phunware, Inc. v. Excelmind Group Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.