Legal Opinion

Carlton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1957No. 37241PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Jessie Ann Carlton, plaintiff in the trial court and appellant herein, obtained a money judgment against Walter Bryson arising out of an automobile accident. Thereafter she instituted garnishment proceedings against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company, garnishee defendants, alleging that they were indebted to Walter Bryson. The trial court held in favor of the insurance companies on the ground that the coverage of the two insurance policies did not extend to Walter Bryson.

The facts are that Walter Bryson is a young man living with his father and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Pennsylvania Thresherman & Farmers' Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. CrapetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Berryman v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Bradshaw v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Alan Jones and Craig Lee McCrackenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Phico Insurance Company v. Providers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Enochs v. Martin Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API