Legal Opinion

South Hills Trust Co. v. Baker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaefee,

Defendant is before us urging that judgment was improperly entered against him for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, first,, because the action, as disclosed by the statement of claim, to which his affidavit responded, was in tort, and therefore no affidavit was required, and, second, if required, it denied the averments made against him in such manner as to prevent judgment.

Plaintiff is a trust company engaged in the business or receiving money on deposit and defendant was employed by it as assistant secretary, assistant treasurer and teller. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Second National Bank v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Pryor v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Kimble v. CarothersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Horner v. HoukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. Thomas Petroleum Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Punxsutawney v. Mitchell (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Halifax Area Joint School System v. Chaundy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API