Fairbanks v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
This case involves sentencing under a recidivist statute, Article 27, § 643B(c), Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl. Vol.). The defendant, John Franklin Fairbanks, Jr., contends that his enhanced sentence was based on a predicate offense not shown by the State to have been free of constitutional infirmity. The defendant contends that the 1972 conviction relied on by the State is constitutionally infirm because there is no showing that he intelligently waived his right to trial by jury. The record discloses that the defendant was represented by counsel at the time of the previous…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Beverly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.