Legal Opinion

Verwoert v. Jenkins

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1918No. Sac. No. 2626PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Alfreda Verwoert, as guardian of the estate of Herman C. Verwoert, obtained an order directing the sale by her, as such guardian, of certain real estate belonging to the wai’d. The order directed that the sale be made at private sale, one-half cash, the balance on a credit not to exceed three years, with interest. The petition did not ask that the sale be at private sale, but was silent on that point. The guardian made a sale to W. 0. Jenkins, appellant herein. A return of said sale was duly made and the court made an order confirming the same. Thereupon Jenkins gave notice to the guardian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrada v. KelseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In Re Estate of WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Halleck v. GuyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Miller & Lux v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In Re Estate of McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mains v. City Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Estate of MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Singer v. CradickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API