Miller & Lux v. Gray
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The complaint in this action charged in two counts. In the first, plaintiff, as assignee of Henry Miller, the surviving partner of the firm of Miller & Lux, sued to recover from defendant the sum of $958, as money had and received by the defendant from Henry Miller. In the second count, plaintiff sued as the assignee of the Merced Security Savings Bank for the same amount of money, as money had and received by defendant for the use and benefit of the bank.
The facts are that the defendant, herein sued in his individual capacity, was and is the administrator of the estatp of William C. Turner,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Durham v. Carbon Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Jones v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Doolan v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Webster v. ConleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mains v. City Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re Estate of BackestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Verwoert v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.