Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Stanton
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 17, 1989No. 88-124PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The issue in this case is whether Ala. Code 1975, § 8-8-10, authorizes the payment of interest on a workmen's compensation judgment.
Duncan Stanton received an award for workmen's compensation benefits and a lump sum attorney fee was awarded to his lawyer, Daniel McCleave. The Second Injury Trust Fund (hereinafter "the Fund") appealed the award of the attorney fee, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that award. Second Injury Trust Fund v.Stanton, 512 So.2d 1377 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987), overruled on other grounds by Ex parte St. Regis Corp., 535 So.2d 160 (Ala. 1988). The Fund then paid the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Nason v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Freeman v. Blue Mountain IndustriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Christopher R. Brown, D.D.S., Inc. v. Decatur County Memorial HospitalIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Fort James Operating Co., Inc. v. IrbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Sullivan, Long & Hagerty, Inc. v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte CreanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.