Legal Opinion

Fort James Operating Co., Inc. v. Irby

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 29, 2005No. 2031183PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the third time that these parties have been before this court.

Originally, after ore tenus proceedings, the trial court found William F. Irby, Jr., to be permanently, totally disabled and awarded benefits accordingly. Fort James Operating Company, Inc., filed a postjudgment motion. Thereafter, the trial court entered an amended judgment awarding Irby certain costs, and it denied the postjudgment motion. Fort James appealed, arguing, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying Fort James a setoff for disability-retirement benefits that Irby has been receiving. In a January…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Gary J. Davis, D/B/A Gary J. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Ex Parte Beaver Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte Weaver WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Walker v. CAROLINA MILLS LUMBER CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. City of Birmingham v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Publix Super Markets, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. GrabenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Fab Arc Steel Supply, Inc. v. DoddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  5. City of Birmingham v. GeorgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API