Legal Opinion

People v. Doe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Fifth Amendment privilege which exists as to private papers cannot be asserted with respect to records which are required, by law, to be kept and which are subject to governmental regulation and inspection. (See Shapiro v United States, 335 US 1, 33; Davis v United *657States, 328 US 582, 589-590; Wilson v United States, 221 US 361, 380; Matter of Cappetta, 42 NY2d 1066, 1067; Matter of Sigety v Hynes, 38 NY2d 260, 268.) To hold otherwise and allow the privilege to cloak such records would make…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. KurianskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Henry v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. D'Agostino, New York County Courts1983
  4. Momah v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. AhmadNew York Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API