Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. Kuriansky
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Wachtler.
The physician-patient privilege originated in this State. It did not exist at common law and the first statute to recognize the privilege was adopted by the New York Legislature in *2371828. This case tests that privilege against a Grand Jury subpoena.
Petitioners, two psychiatrists, have moved to quash subpoenas requiring them to produce records before a Grand Jury investigating complaints of Medicaid fraud. Their primary contentions are that compliance with the subpoenas will violate their Fifth Amendment rights, as well as the physician-patient…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cynthia B. v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Nassau County Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated June 24, 2003New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. SlavinNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Harvey v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. ElyseeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. Gearhart, New York County Courts1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.