Legal Opinion

Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum v. Kuriansky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1987PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Wachtler.

The physician-patient privilege originated in this State. It did not exist at common law and the first statute to recognize the privilege was adopted by the New York Legislature in *2371828. This case tests that privilege against a Grand Jury subpoena.

Petitioners, two psychiatrists, have moved to quash subpoenas requiring them to produce records before a Grand Jury investigating complaints of Medicaid fraud. Their primary contentions are that compliance with the subpoenas will violate their Fifth Amendment rights, as well as the physician-patient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cynthia B. v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Nassau County Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated June 24, 2003New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. SlavinNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Harvey v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. ElyseeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. Gearhart, New York County Courts1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API