Legal Opinion

Wagner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1985No. S.F. 24782PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*463Opinion

KAUS, J.*

Section 11580.2 of the Insurance Code1 provides for quasi-compulsory uninsured motorists (UM) coverage for most kinds of automobile liability policies. Among others, UM coverage protects as insureds the named insured, as well as family members living in the same household. (§ 11580.2, subd. (b).) Subdivision (d) of section 11580.2 (subdivision (d)) permits UM policies to provide “that if the insured has insurance available to him under more than one uninsured motorist coverage provision, any damages shall not be deemed to exceed the higher of the applicable limits of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ShmitkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eddy v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Fagundes v. American International Adjustment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Malone v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. FrankelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API