Legal Opinion

Shumpert v. Service Life & Health Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1951No. 16566PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

StukES, Justice.

Respondent recovered verdict and judgment for actual and punitive damages against appellant upon a cause of action for fraud and deceit in the issuance of insurance. There were two policies, one of which was upon the life of respondent in the sum of $250.00 with his wife, Martie, as the beneficiary. It was so recited on the outside of the policy but it was described as a “Family Protective Policy.” The other is described in the record as a hospitalization, surgery, accidental death, and dismemberment policy, which recites a group policy issued to South Carolina Farm Bureau as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Cook v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Lusk v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Hood v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Rodarte v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  3. McMillan v. RIDGESSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Weatherford v. Home Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Reid v. George Washington Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API