Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Celebration Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2001No. 990521Published

1DissentHowe, Chief Justice

T19 I dissent. The majority errs in employing the common law to replace the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act(URBCA), which was enacted to replace common law corporate principles. The majority's deviation from the URBCA, and cases interpreting it, and the majority's failure to recognize relevant facts leave me no alternative but to dissent.

T20 Utah corporations are exhaustively governed from creation to dissolution by the URBCA. See generally Utah Code Ann. § 16-10a-101 to 1705 (1998). The URBCA requires corporations to file an annual report with the Division of Corporations and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interwest Construction v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Steenblik v. LichfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Houston v. Utah Lake Land, Water & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Murphy v. CroslandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. White v. DvorakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API