Legal Opinion
Steenblik v. Lichfield
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1995No. 930358PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:
Plaintiff Lawanna Steenblik sued Zephor Planning Corporation, a financial planning company through which she invested and lost her life savings, and four individuals connected with Zephor in various capacities. Appellant Aaron Lichfield was Zephor’s vice-president and a director. He was also a financial planner. The other individual defendants were Robert I. Rasmussen, Zephor’s president, a director, and a financial planner; his wife, Debra Rasmussen, the corporate secretary; and Scott Craw, a financial planner. Steenblik alleged violations of Utah’s Uniform…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Rochez Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Charles R. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Monsen v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.