Legal Opinion
Sarkes v. Wells
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1930No. 5272PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Appeal by George Sarkes, bankrupt, from an order of the District Court adjudging him in contempt for failure to obey an order, made by the referee, directing the bankrupt to deliver to the appellee trustee the sum of $3,000 and a diamond ring. The turnover order, wherein it was found that the bankrupt at the time of bankruptcy had the money and ring in his possession and under his control, was regularly made on April 12, 1928, upon the petition of the trustee and after a full hearing. Appellant having failed to comply, the referee certified the facts found to the judge,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- International Agr. Corp. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Toplitz v. WalserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- In Re SieglerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- In Re DavidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Danish v. SofranskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Seligson v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Clements v. CoppinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Levy v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Kasimov v. SoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.