Legal Opinion

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1945No. Patent Appeals 4972PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 59' U.S.P.Q. 27, speaking through the First Assistant Commissioner, affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences, which sustained appellee’s notice of opposition to the registration of appellant’s trade-mark and adjudged that the applicant (appellant) was not entitled to the registration applied for, appellant has here appealed.

The goods of appellant (hereinafter referred to as Firestone) and those of appellee (hereinafter referred to as Montgomery Ward) upon which their respective marks are used are, in each instance,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Spiegel Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hancock v. American Steel & Wire Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Rockwood Chocolate Co., Inc. v. Hoffman Candy CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Jerry Finn v. Cooper's IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. The Quaker Oats Company v. St. Joe Processing Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API