Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1902No. 3,494PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; W. G. Utz, Special Judge- Action by James R. Kelly against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company and the city of Jeffersonville for damages for the overflow of' land. From a judgment for defendants, on demurrer to complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellant was plaintiff below, and his complaint was held bad on separate demurrers. ■. He declined to plead further, and judgment was rendered against him for costs. By his assignment of errors he questions the correctness of the court’s action in sustaining the demurrers to-the complaint.

The complaint avers that on December 3, 1867, the common council of the city of Jeffersonville passed an ordinance granting to the predecessor of appellee railroad company *459the right to construct and maintain its railroad on and along Ninth street, between certain • points named by said ordinance; that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Byrnes v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. City of Evansville v. DeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Town Council of Town of Hudson v. LaddWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Co. v. QuillenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Hintz v. WagnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Seigmund v. TynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API