Hintz v. Wagner
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment and order of the District Court of Wells County; Burke, and Coffey, JJ. If the plaintiff’s minor daughters had worked out and earned wages, such wages would have belonged, not to her, but to Carl Hintz, their father, and are therefore not a proper element of damages in this case. Rev. Codes 1905, § 4092; Am. Dig. Century ed. cols. 2471, 2480, §§ 4466, 4475; Hanson v. Boyd, 161 H. S. 397, 40 L. ed. 746, 16 Sup. Ct.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment and order of the District Court of Wells County; Burke, and Coffey, JJ. If the plaintiff’s minor daughters had worked out and earned wages, such wages would have belonged, not to her, but to Carl Hintz, their father, and are therefore not a proper element of damages in this case. Rev. Codes 1905, § 4092; Am. Dig. Century ed. cols. 2471, 2480, §§ 4466, 4475; Hanson v. Boyd, 161 H. S. 397, 40 L. ed. 746, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 571; Miller v. Keokuk & D. M. R. Co. 63 Iowa, 680, 16 N. W. 567; Mackey v. Olssen, 12 Or. 429, 8 Bac. 357; Hazard Powder Co. v. Yolger, 7 C. C. A. 130,…
1Opinion of the Court
Spalding, Ch. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a personal altercation with the defendant, over some live stock belonging to him which had trespassed upon land belonging to plaintiff’s husband. We do not find it necessary to enter into a detailed statement of the evidence adduced at the trial. A verdict for $2,000 was returned in favor of plaintiff. A new trial was denied on *120plaintiff consenting to a reduction of. the verdict to $1,710. From the order denying a new trial, and the judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor, this appeal was taken. A new…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Quaife v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Darrigan v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tucker v. ReilArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Friendship Auto Sales, Inc. v. Bank of Willamette ValleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Hunder Ex Rel. Hunder v. RindlaubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Wise v. MonterosArizona Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.