United States v. Michael I. Monus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
After Michael I. Monus was convicted of various financial crimes, this court upheld his conviction but remanded for resentenc-ing. Subsequently, Monus moved for: (1) a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence, (2) a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), and (3) a writ of coram nobis. The district court determined that the motion for a new trial was untimely, that the motion for sentence reduction was without merit because the new sentencing guideline at issue was substantive and not clarifying (and thus not retroactive), and that the coram…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michael I. MonusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Cross (90-3421) v. Robert A. Williams, (90-3239), Althea Anderson, (90-3305), Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Howell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Donavon Huff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Thomas Reid DecarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GeerkenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.