Legal Opinion
United States v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 5, 2010No. 08-11760, 08-11797PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
In separate appeals, which we have consolidated because they raise the same issue, Andrea Mills and Joshua Brown (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the denial of their motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 1 Finding that in both cases, Defendants’ statutory mandatory minimum sentences left the district courts without jurisdiction to hear their sentence reduction motions, we affirm the district courts’ judgments.
We begin with a brief recitation of Mills’s and Brown’s respective circumstances.
I
A
Mills and a codefendant were caught in a sting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- McKay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Deshawn Travis GloverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Laschell HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Louis Jean HippolyteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Daniel SiddonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.