The Fischer Brewing Co., Inc. v. Flax
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Patton, Presiding Judge.
Richard French sought both a motion for a protective order and a motion to quash on grounds of attorney-client privilege, a subpoena de bene esse issued by the District of Columbia law firm of Paley, Rothman, Goldstein, Rosenberg & Cooper (“Paley Rothman”). French also sought a protective order regarding a Paley Rothman subpoena for inspection of a computer in French’s possession that contained records compiled by a defunct company called RG Investment Company. The court denied the motion to quash and further denied the motions for protective orders. French appeals.
Two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New Winchester Gardens, Ltd. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Shea Gould Climenko & Casey v. Simpson Thacher & BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas v. RomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013