Legal Opinion

The Fischer Brewing Co., Inc. v. Flax

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2000No. 76155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Patton, Presiding Judge.

Richard French sought both a motion for a protective order and a motion to quash on grounds of attorney-client privilege, a subpoena de bene esse issued by the District of Columbia law firm of Paley, Rothman, Goldstein, Rosenberg & Cooper (“Paley Rothman”). French also sought a protective order regarding a Paley Rothman subpoena for inspection of a computer in French’s possession that contained records compiled by a defunct company called RG Investment Company. The court denied the motion to quash and further denied the motions for protective orders. French appeals.

Two…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Winchester Gardens, Ltd. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Shea Gould Climenko & Casey v. Simpson Thacher & BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. RomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API