Shea Gould Climenko & Casey v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shanley N. Egeth, J.
The instant motion seeks an order from this court compelling disclosure of five documents presently claimed to be in the possession of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett (Simpson Thacher) attorneys for plaintiff, Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (PP & L).
The action within which discovery is sought is presently pending in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. In that action plaintiff claims breach of a contract based upon claimed failure of the defendant to supply nuclear fuel fabrication services and uranium for plaintiff’s reactors. Defendant disputes the existence of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Barnes v. Confidential PartyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Jarvis v. JarvisNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998
- The Fischer Brewing Co., Inc. v. FlaxOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Thomas v. RomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013