Legal Opinion

Shea Gould Climenko & Casey v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Shanley N. Egeth, J.

The instant motion seeks an order from this court compelling disclosure of five documents presently claimed to be in the possession of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett (Simpson Thacher) attorneys for plaintiff, Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (PP & L).

The action within which discovery is sought is presently pending in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. In that action plaintiff claims breach of a contract based upon claimed failure of the defendant to supply nuclear fuel fabrication services and uranium for plaintiff’s reactors. Defendant disputes the existence of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Confidential PartyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jarvis v. JarvisNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. The Fischer Brewing Co., Inc. v. FlaxOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Thomas v. RomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API