Legal Opinion
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1986No. 49826 and 49834PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParrino, C.J.
Appellants Darryl E. Pittman and Steven L. Howland appeal from sanctions imposed against them pursuant to Civ. R. 37. The decision of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
I
Appellants represented Debra L. Thompson, defendant, at the taking of a deposition in Cleveland, Ohio, concerning an action filed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania by appellee, E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc. On January 21, 1983, a praecipe to issue a writ of summons for Thompson was filed by appellee in the Philadelphia court. Thompson received the writ of summons in Cleveland, Ohio on January 24, 1983.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Midwest Sportservice, Inc. v. AndreoliOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gravill v. ParkhurstOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Natural Essentials, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State ex rel. Vetus Partners, L.L.C. v. CalabreseOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- The Fischer Brewing Co., Inc. v. FlaxOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Thomas v. RomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013