Legal Opinion

State v. Livingston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1993No. S-92-1102, S-92-1103PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Jesse L. Livingston claims the Nebraska Court of Appeals erred when it summarily affirmed the district court’s denial of his motions for postconviction relief in these two unrelated cases which have been consolidated for disposition in this court.

Livingston argues that the trial court erred when it denied him an evidentiary hearing and denied his request for appointed counsel in regard to the proceedings on his postconviction relief motions.

Following the Court of Appeals’ summary affirmances, we granted Livingston’s petitions for further review. After reviewing the two records involved, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. VictorNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. RodriguezNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. BoppreNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. SoukharithNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BecerraNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. JamesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API