Legal Opinion

Keife v. Logan

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2003No. 38029PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves the issue of whether, after a railroad company abandons a right-of-way, the adjacent landowner or the underlying landowner is entitled to the reversionary interest in the right-of-way. We hold that the reversionary interest in the right-of-way vests in the landowner who establishes title to the land underlying the right-of-way.

FACTS

In 1971, Paul J. Keife purchased real property located in Wadsworth, Nevada. Keife’s property is adjacent to the disputed property, the railroad right-of-way.

In 1989, Nolan Logan purchased twenty-seven acres of land, which included the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Maroa v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Marlow v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. City of Aberdeen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
  4. City of Buckley v. Burlington Northern Railroad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Birth Mother v. Adoptive ParentsNevada Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Awada v. Shuffle Master, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Whitemaine v. AniskovichNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hamm v. Arrowcreek Homeowners' Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review PanelNevada Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API